Pluralism

My initial thought before I even read the text was "separation of church and state." Sure enough, Davis covers the topic toward the latter end of the first chapter. Davis argues that it was never the founding Fathers intent to separate the value systems between church and state, but rather "to rule out preferential treatment for any single Christian denomination" (Davis 24). Which I happen to agree with. However, given the fact that Emerson v. The Board of Education has "begun and progressed in the wall between church and state" (p.24) then relevant factors must be taken into consideration. Other factors here inevitably include those who are unbelievers. Contrary to the word of God, but within their American right to not be subject to evangelism if that is their choice. The reality of our nation is that we live in a pluralistic society. Sounds redundant to the assignment topic itself but it's true! Over time, pluralism became the norm and I question whether there is any viable return. My logical mind doesn't think so.  Simultaneously, I believe that Christ can reach anybody at will and is able to use other means beyond traditional evangelism. I think it's important to note that although there is a clear separation between church and state in our country, God's wisdom and law are active in our legal system. It is not termed "morality" per se, but "killing another, stealing, trespass, etc." are a violation of our criminal/civil codes. These may not be in reverence to Christ, but they are a form of maintaining respect for each other. In my view, pluralism isn't good or bad, it's simply a reality that cannot be overlooked.